Reincarnation in the Bible

The Word of Now claims to be the messages of the reincarnate spirit of John the Baptist who Jesus said was Elijah. So one point of authenticity rests on the doctrine of reincarnation. It seems that every major religion in the world, including Judaism, has reincarnation as a tenant of belief. And yet Christianity which comes out of Judaism, has refuted it. Perhaps a closer look at what the Bible scriptures have to say about this would be advisable.

The first five books of the Old Testament are credited to Moses. Moses was like unto a Prince of Egypt and was educated in the Egyptian Mystery School established by Akhenaten and Nefertiti under the direction of Joseph, son of Rachel and Jacob (Israel). At the time of Joseph, there was a great famine and people came from all over the lands to find refuge in Egypt where Joseph had secured seven years of food storage. This migration included learned men of science, medicine, spirit, and art from many different lands, cultures and traditions. This influx of knowledge created a renaissance of a Golden Age for Egypt and the establishment of great centers of learning like the Mystery Schools where a prince of Egypt certainly would have studied. This information adds interest to the competition between the Egyptian High Priests of Pharaoh’s court at the time of the exodus, as these priests had undoubtedly the same knowledge as Moses from the Mystery Schools, and yet Moses had more power.

Even though, Moses was not allowed to see the New Land, none the less, he was taken up to Heaven without tasting death, a knowledge of the Egyptian Mystery School where 10,000 had ascended. In fact the Bible is rich with stories of ascension as Elijah, Isaiah, and Enoch and his entire city ascended. Both Moses and Elijah were present at the Mount of Transfiguration when Jesus attained his Ascension body. We believe that the Word of Now has instructions for us at this time, in how to achieve this ascension.

Moses, having been the founder of Judaism, the Old Testament, and the Mosaic Laws of Karma, also suggests that the early Hebrews had all the information of the Mysteries. Somehow between Moses and what has been compiled of the present day Christian Bible, not all the Mysteries have been passed on. Of note is the Ethiopian Jewish Scriptures which are said to be 3 feet high suggesting that much knowledge has been bestowed and yet, the modern Bible is only a fraction of what has been given.

The Vatican has six layers of catacombs filled with parchments, scrolls, books, artifacts and truths that they have kept hidden from the People for centuries. The curious would wonder what all has been kept from the general knowledge of humanity in its quest for enlightenment and spiritual advancement.

The Zohar, a 36 volume Rabbinical text dated 700 years before Christ, states explicitly that Adam would later come as the Messiah, as Adam introduced death and by karmic (Mosaic) law, Adam would have to undo what he had done, coming back as the Messiah and victory over death. There are countless prophecies concerning this Messiah in the Bible, and of which ONLY Emmanuel, or Jesus Christ, completed.

God knew Jeremiah before he was even formed in the womb. This is plain biblical speech of an individual existing before birth.

Jeremiah 1:4 Then the word of the LORD came unto me, saying, 5 Before I formed thee in the belly I knew thee; and before thou earnest forth out of the womb I sanctified thee, and I ordained thee a prophet unto the nations.

Indeed the re-incarnationist can even find scriptural support for personal disincarnate preexistence. You can take the following Bible verse as proof of preexistence:

"He chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blemish in his sight and love." (Ephesians 1:4)

Malachi 1:2-3 and Romans 9:11-13 both state that God loved Jacob, but hated Esau even before

they were born. These verses are highly suggestive of the pre-existence of Esau, a necessary tenet associated with reincarnation.

Job 1:20-21 Then Job arose and tore his robe and shaved his head and he fell to the ground and worshipped. And he said, "Naked I came from my mother's womb, and naked I shall return there. The Lord gave and the Lord has taken away. Blessed be the name of the Lord."

Job says here that he will return to be born again in a womb indicating that he expects to reincarnate.

In Job 19 Job speaks even plainer of having flesh again after his flesh has rotted away.

Job 19:25 I know that my Redeemer lives, and that in the end he will stand upon the earth. 26 And after my skin has been destroyed, yet in my flesh I will see God; 27 I myself will see him with my own eyes-I, and not another. How my heart yearns within me!

"Generations come and generations go, but the earth remains forever. The sun rises and the sunsets, and hurries back to where it rises. The wind blows to the south and turns to the north; round and round it goes, ever returning on its course. All streams flow into the sea, yet the sea is never full. To the place the streams come from, there they return again ... What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." (Ecclesiastes 1:4-9)

The Hebrew kabbalists interpreted this quote to mean that a generation dies and subsequently returns by the process of reincarnation.

There are many other Bible verses which are suggestive of reincarnation. One episode in particular from the healing miracles of Christ seems to point to reincarnation:

"And as he was passing by, be saw a man blind from birth. And his disciples asked him, 'Rabbi, who has sinned, this man or his parents, that he should be born blind?" Jesus answered, 'Neither bas this man sinned, nor his parents, but the works of God were to be made manifest in him."'

The disciples ask the Lord if the man himself could have committed the sin that led to his blindness. Given the fact that the man has been blind from birth, we are confronted with a provocative question. When could he have made such transgressions as to make him blind at birth? The only conceivable answer is in some prenatal state. The question as posed by the disciples explicitly presupposes prenatal existence. It will also be noted that Christ says nothing to dispel or correct the presupposition.

Also very suggestive of reincarnation is the episode where Jesus identifies John the Baptist as Elijah.

"For all the prophets and the law have prophesied until John. And if you are willing to receive it, he is Elijah who was to come." (Matthew 11:13-14)

And the disciples asked him, saying, 'Why then do the scribes say that Elijah must come first?' But he answered them and said, 'Elijah indeed is to come and will restore all things. But I say to has come already, and they did not know him, but did to him whatever they wished. So also shall the Son of Man suffer at their hand.' Then the disciples understood that he had spoken of John the Baptist." (Matthew 17:1 0-13)

As for the John the Baptist-Elijah episode, there can be little question as to its purpose. By identifying the Baptist as Elijah, Jesus is identifying himself as the Messiah. Throughout the gospel narrative there are explicit references to the signs that will precede the Messiah.

"Behold I will send you Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord." (Malachi 4:5)

This is one of the many messianic promises of the Old Testament. One of the signs that the true Messiah has come, according to this passage from Malachi, is that he be preceded by a forerunner, by Elijah.

Although the Bible also contains other reincarnational passages, these Elijah-John passages constitute clear proof of reincarnation:

1. The Old Testament prophesied that Elijah himself (not someone "like" him or someone "similar" to him, but Elijah himself) would return before the advent of the Messiah.

2. Jesus declared that John the Baptist was Elijah who had returned, stating bluntly "Elijah has come". Now, based on these passages alone, either (A) or (B) must be true:

(A) John the Baptist was Elijah himself, meaning that Elijah had reincarnated. If this is true, then

reincarnation must belong in Christian theology, and the West's entire doctrinal interpretation of "Life After Death" in general and the "Last Day Resurrection" in particular, must be radically revised, or. ..

(B) John the Baptist was not Elijah himself, meaning that Elijah himself had not returned. If this is so,then either:

(1) The Old Testament prophecy about Elijah returning before the Messiah failed to come to pass

Basically, it comes down to this simple question: What do you want to believe? One of the following A,B, or C, must logically be true:

As surely as two and two make four, one of the above must be true. At any rate, the passage in which

The following verse is used to refute the John the Baptist/Elijah reincarnation connection. The Bible tells us that John the Baptist possessed, " ... the spirit and power of Elijah." (Luke 1:17)

Those who refute this reincarnation connection say that John the Baptist merely carne in the spirit and power of Elijah. However, this is a perfect description of reincarnation: the spirit and power. This is reincarnation- the reincarnation of the spirit. The Bible itself states that John the Baptist possessed the spirit that had previously lived in, and as, the man Elijah- not his physical being and memory, but his spirit. John carried Elijah's living spirit, but not his physical memory. And since John did not possess Elijah's physical memory, he did not possess the memories of being the man Elijah.

Finally they said, "Who are you? Give us an answer to take back to those who sent us. What do you say about yourself?"

John replied in the words of Isaiah the prophet, "I am the voice of one calling in the desert, 'Make straight the way for the Lord."'

Now some Pharisees who bad been sent questioned him, "Why then do you baptize if you are not the Christ, nor Elijah, nor the Prophet."

"I baptize with water," John replied, "but among you stands one you do not know. He is the one who comes after me, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie."

"This is the one •.• there has not risen anyone greater than John the Baptist ••.. And if you are willing to accept it, he is the Elijah who was to come. He who has ears, let him hear." (Matthew 11:11-15).

It comes down to this: Jesus said John was Elijah, and John said he wasn't. Which of the two is to be

There is a prophecy in the Book of Revelation concerning the days before the second coming of Christ. Two prophets are predicted to appear at this time working the same miracles and performing the same ministries as those of Elijah and Moses.

"And I will give power to my two witnesses, and they will prophesy for 1,260 days, clothed in sackcloth. These are the two olive trees and the two lampstands that stand before the Lord of the earth. If anyone tries to harm them, fire comes from their mouths and devours their enemies. This is how anyone who wants to harm them must die. These men have power to shut up the sky so that it will not rain during the time they are prophesying; and they have power to turn the waters into blood and to strike the earth with every kind of plague as often as they want."

While the verses in Revelation do not specifically identify the two prophets to come as Elijah and Moses, it strongly suggests that it is them. If Elijah and Moses are to "rise" again before the second coming of Christ, then it is clear the only possible way for them to do so is through reincarnation.

After the death of John the Baptist, whom Jesus identified as Elijah, Elijah appears again along with Moses at the Mount of Transfiguration:

"After six days Jesus took with him Peter, James and John the brother of James, and led them up a high mountain by themselves. There he was transfigured before them. His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light. Just then there appeared before them Moses and Elijah, talking with Jesus.

Peter said to Jesus, "Lord, it is good for us to be here. If you wish, I will put up three shelters-- one for you, one for Moses and one for Elijah."

While he was still speaking, a bright cloud enveloped them, and a voice from the cloud said, "This is my Son, whom I love; with him I am well pleased. Listen to him!"

But Jesus came and touched them. "Get up," he said. "Don't be afraid." When they looked up, they saw no one except Jesus.

As they were coming down the mountain, Jesus instructed them, "Don't tell anyone what you have seen, until the Son of Man has been raised from the dead."

The disciples asked him, "Why then do the teachers of the law say that Elijah must come first?" Jesus replied, “To be sure, Elijah comes and will restore all things. But I tell you, Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but have done to him everything they wished. In the same way the Son of Man is going to suffer at their hands." Then the disciples understood that he was talking to them about John the Baptist."

The scriptures strongly suggest a connection between Elijah and Moses with the ministries of Jesus. Since Jesus already identified Elijah as appearing during his first ministry, it is not hard to conclude that Elijah will appear again at Jesus' second coming. Even the Old Testament suggests this will be the case:

"Behold I will send you Elijah the prophet, before the coming of the great and dreadful day of the Lord." (Malachi 4:5)

So if these messages through Sam are real, then Elijah has already come, and the Second Coming of Christ is nigh.

There is another reference to reincarnation in the gospels; an indirect reference, yet an unmistakable one.

In all three of the synoptic gospels, Jesus promised that anyone leaving their homes, wives, mothers,

fathers, children, or farms to follow him would personally receive hundreds more such homes, families, and so on in the future. Jesus said:

"No one who has left home or brothers or sisters or mother or father or wife or children or land for me and the gospel will fail to receive a hundred times as much in this present age - homes, brothers, sisters, mothers, children and fields •.. and in the age to come, eternal life." (Mark 10:29-30)

Outside of the doctrine of reincarnation it's difficult to imagine how such a promise could be fulf1lled. In one lifetime, one can only have a single set of real parents, and no one seriously proposes that each of the 70 original disciples, who actually did leave their homes and families, ever received as compensation a hundred wives, a hundred fields, and so on. Either this statement of Jesus' occurred when he was waxing so poetic as to allow a falsehood to pass his lips, or he was making a promise that only many reincarnations could fulfill.

There are some who try to explain away this as being fulfilled by the church. It could be if Jesus had only promised brothers and sisters. But the promise for wives, husbands, homes and mothers cannot be explained away by the church. Christ knew that his disciples would reincarnate more than once and that because of the sacrifice made for him, their subsequent lives would be repayment for what they lost. See in Matthew 24 Jesus makes a detailed prophecy of all of the things that must occur before his return. At the end of the prophecy he makes this promise:

Matt 24:34 I tell you the truth, this generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have happened. NIV

The only way this verse can be true is if the disciples and others alive at that time of Jesus are reincarnated just before his return. Otherwise he is a liar.

I also would like to point out that the Catholic Church outlawed and put to death those that preached Reincarnation:

IF anyone asserts the fabulous pre-existence of souls, and shall assert the monstrous restoration which follows from it: let him be anathema.**

This is the same church that made Sabbath keeping punishable by death in the THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA IN PHRYGIA PACATIANA 364 A.D.

CHRISTIANS must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.

Is it possible Satan was behind both of these suppressions? Something to think about.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Anathema is a term with several meanings. It derives from Greek ἀνάθεμα, which meant "something dedicated" and, in theSeptuagint and New Testament, "something dedicated to evil and thus accursed."^[1]

Colloquial usage[edit]

Anathema (in the sense of a curse) attributed to Pope Gregory XI

In general usage, the word "anathema" means vehement disagreement with or dislike of something.

Examples: "Some people consider this definition anathema;" or "Doing homework after school is a complete anathema to her;" or "That political party would paint as anathema any idea not their own, no matter how good it is."

Religious usage[edit]

The Old Testament applied the word to anything set aside for sacrifice, and thus banned from profane use and dedicated to destruction—as, in the case of religious wars, the enemy and their cities and possessions. The New Testament uses the word to mean a curse and forced expulsion of someone from the Christian community.^[2]

Judaism[edit]

The Greek word ἀνάθεμα (anathema), meaning something offered to a divinity, appeared in the translation of the Jewish Bible known as the Septuagint to render the Hebrew word חרם (herem), and appears in verses such as Leviticus 27:28 to refer to things that are offered to God and so banned for common (non-religious) use. The Hebrew word was also used for what was devoted, by virtue of a simple vow, not to the Lord, but to the priest.^[3] In postexilic Judaism, the meaning of the word changed to an expression of God's displeasure with all persons, Jew or pagan, who do not subordinate their personal conduct and tendencies to the discipline of the theocracy, and must be purged from the community—thus making anathema an instrument of synagogal discipline.^[4]

New Testament[edit]

The noun ἀνάθεμα (anathema) occurs in the Greek New Testament six times: in 1 Cor 12:3; 16:22; 9&src=ESV Gal 1:8, 9; Rom 9:3; Acts 23:14. Its meaning in the New Testament is disfavour of God, a meaning that, according to Vine's Complete Expository Dictionary of Old Testament and New Testament Word, in Acts 23:14 to the sentence of disfavour, and in the other instances to the object of God's disfavour.^[5]

Colloquial usage[edit]

Religious usage[edit]

Judaism[edit]

New Testament[edit]

Early Church[edit]